curl --request GET \
--url https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id} \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer <token>'import requests
url = "https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}"
headers = {"Authorization": "Bearer <token>"}
response = requests.get(url, headers=headers)
print(response.text)const options = {method: 'GET', headers: {Authorization: 'Bearer <token>'}};
fetch('https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}', options)
.then(res => res.json())
.then(res => console.log(res))
.catch(err => console.error(err));<?php
$curl = curl_init();
curl_setopt_array($curl, [
CURLOPT_URL => "https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}",
CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER => true,
CURLOPT_ENCODING => "",
CURLOPT_MAXREDIRS => 10,
CURLOPT_TIMEOUT => 30,
CURLOPT_HTTP_VERSION => CURL_HTTP_VERSION_1_1,
CURLOPT_CUSTOMREQUEST => "GET",
CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER => [
"Authorization: Bearer <token>"
],
]);
$response = curl_exec($curl);
$err = curl_error($curl);
curl_close($curl);
if ($err) {
echo "cURL Error #:" . $err;
} else {
echo $response;
}package main
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"io"
)
func main() {
url := "https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}"
req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", url, nil)
req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Bearer <token>")
res, _ := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
defer res.Body.Close()
body, _ := io.ReadAll(res.Body)
fmt.Println(string(body))
}HttpResponse<String> response = Unirest.get("https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}")
.header("Authorization", "Bearer <token>")
.asString();require 'uri'
require 'net/http'
url = URI("https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}")
http = Net::HTTP.new(url.host, url.port)
http.use_ssl = true
request = Net::HTTP::Get.new(url)
request["Authorization"] = 'Bearer <token>'
response = http.request(request)
puts response.read_body{
"id": "6865d67ede0cf7e8fd94e4dd",
"sheet_id": 1750822302,
"email": "ac@test.com",
"name": "Alex",
"holes": [
1,
2,
3
],
"attempt": 1,
"status": "draft",
"test": 0,
"created_at": "2025-07-03T01:01:50.474Z",
"submitted_at": "2025-07-03T01:18:49.446Z",
"processing_started_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:09.137Z",
"processing_finished_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:27.018Z",
"candidate_emailed_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:28.087Z",
"company_emailed_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:28.076Z",
"webhook_completed_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:30.123Z",
"course": {
"1": {
"id": 1,
"title": "Midlife Crisis Sports Car Database",
"category": "intermediate",
"difficulty": 5,
"description": "A car dealership system specifically targets men experiencing existential dread...",
"human": {
"input_format": "Corporate executive crisis with status anxiety",
"output_format": "Professional image optimization with financial prudence",
"examples": {
"input": "52-year-old engineer, separation, teenagers mock minivan",
"output": "Reliable Camaro, payment around alimony, emphasize practicality"
}
},
"hints": [
"Engineers think they're too logical for status symbols (they're wrong)",
"Lease payments should never exceed therapy costs"
]
},
"2": {
"id": 2,
"title": "Viking Raid Optimization Algorithm",
"category": "intermediate",
"difficulty": 6
}
},
"message": "Hi team, here are my solutions!",
"shots": {
"1": {
"language": "human",
"code": "52-year-old engineer, separation, teenagers mock minivan. Recommendation: Reliable Camaro, payment around alimony, emphasize practicality."
},
"2": {
"language": "math",
"code": "m=15, v=50000000, r=0.9 → C=45%, V=$22500000, I=5%"
}
},
"scorecard": {
"sheet_id": 1750822302,
"holes": {
"1": {
"first": {
"personality": "jaded_dev",
"quality": {
"score": 70,
"commentary": "The recommendation is practical, but prioritizes short-term status boosts over long-term financial security."
},
"length": {
"score": 75,
"commentary": "Solution length: 222 characters"
},
"creativity": {
"score": 60,
"commentary": "The use of 'separation' and 'teenagers mock minivan' as input variables is clever, but the output is surprisingly straightforward."
},
"ingenuity": {
"score": 75,
"commentary": "The payment plan structured around alimony is a nice touch, demonstrating an understanding of the customer's financial constraints."
},
"humor": {
"score": 50,
"commentary": "The deadpan delivery is appreciated, but the solution lacks real bite or irony."
},
"correctness": {
"score": 85,
"commentary": "The recommendation is logically coherent and financially responsible."
},
"feedback": "This solution is a decent starting point, but lacks the clever psychological manipulation required to truly succeed in this space."
},
"second": {
"personality": "jaded_dev",
"quality": {
"score": 80,
"commentary": "Practical wisdom shines through in the recommendation of a reliable Camaro."
}
},
"third": {
"personality": "jaded_dev",
"quality": {
"score": 70,
"commentary": "We appreciate the concise, human-centered approach."
}
}
}
},
"summary": "Analyzed 3 questions with 3 jaded reviewers. Overall: 447/90. Strongest: Correctness (81). Weakest: Humor (66). The code has survived the gauntlet.",
"created_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:09.137Z"
}
}{
"error": "token_expired",
"message": "Your authentication token has expired. Please login again."
}{
"error": "submission_not_found",
"message": "The requested submission could not be found."
}{
"error": "internal_server_error",
"message": "Something went wrong on our end. We're looking into it."
}Individual Analysis
Individual Submission Details
Get complete details for a specific submission, including analysis if available.
What you get:
- Full submission metadata and timeline
- Complete question context via “course” key with variation-specific content
- Candidate’s solutions for all questions
- Analysis scores and commentary (when complete)
- Processing timestamps and current status
- Email delivery confirmations
- Everything needed for hiring decisions
Course data structure:
- Questions keyed by ID with complete context
- Includes the specific variation content the candidate received
- Variation letters (A-E) are never exposed for security
- Provides full question details: description, examples, hints, edge cases
Scorecard structure:
- 3 personalities evaluate each solution
- Scores range from 15-90 across 5 dimensions
- Detailed commentary explaining the scoring
- Overall summary with strengths and weaknesses
curl --request GET \
--url https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id} \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer <token>'import requests
url = "https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}"
headers = {"Authorization": "Bearer <token>"}
response = requests.get(url, headers=headers)
print(response.text)const options = {method: 'GET', headers: {Authorization: 'Bearer <token>'}};
fetch('https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}', options)
.then(res => res.json())
.then(res => console.log(res))
.catch(err => console.error(err));<?php
$curl = curl_init();
curl_setopt_array($curl, [
CURLOPT_URL => "https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}",
CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER => true,
CURLOPT_ENCODING => "",
CURLOPT_MAXREDIRS => 10,
CURLOPT_TIMEOUT => 30,
CURLOPT_HTTP_VERSION => CURL_HTTP_VERSION_1_1,
CURLOPT_CUSTOMREQUEST => "GET",
CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER => [
"Authorization: Bearer <token>"
],
]);
$response = curl_exec($curl);
$err = curl_error($curl);
curl_close($curl);
if ($err) {
echo "cURL Error #:" . $err;
} else {
echo $response;
}package main
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"io"
)
func main() {
url := "https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}"
req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", url, nil)
req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Bearer <token>")
res, _ := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
defer res.Body.Close()
body, _ := io.ReadAll(res.Body)
fmt.Println(string(body))
}HttpResponse<String> response = Unirest.get("https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}")
.header("Authorization", "Bearer <token>")
.asString();require 'uri'
require 'net/http'
url = URI("https://api.errorgolf.com/v1/playback/{id}")
http = Net::HTTP.new(url.host, url.port)
http.use_ssl = true
request = Net::HTTP::Get.new(url)
request["Authorization"] = 'Bearer <token>'
response = http.request(request)
puts response.read_body{
"id": "6865d67ede0cf7e8fd94e4dd",
"sheet_id": 1750822302,
"email": "ac@test.com",
"name": "Alex",
"holes": [
1,
2,
3
],
"attempt": 1,
"status": "draft",
"test": 0,
"created_at": "2025-07-03T01:01:50.474Z",
"submitted_at": "2025-07-03T01:18:49.446Z",
"processing_started_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:09.137Z",
"processing_finished_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:27.018Z",
"candidate_emailed_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:28.087Z",
"company_emailed_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:28.076Z",
"webhook_completed_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:30.123Z",
"course": {
"1": {
"id": 1,
"title": "Midlife Crisis Sports Car Database",
"category": "intermediate",
"difficulty": 5,
"description": "A car dealership system specifically targets men experiencing existential dread...",
"human": {
"input_format": "Corporate executive crisis with status anxiety",
"output_format": "Professional image optimization with financial prudence",
"examples": {
"input": "52-year-old engineer, separation, teenagers mock minivan",
"output": "Reliable Camaro, payment around alimony, emphasize practicality"
}
},
"hints": [
"Engineers think they're too logical for status symbols (they're wrong)",
"Lease payments should never exceed therapy costs"
]
},
"2": {
"id": 2,
"title": "Viking Raid Optimization Algorithm",
"category": "intermediate",
"difficulty": 6
}
},
"message": "Hi team, here are my solutions!",
"shots": {
"1": {
"language": "human",
"code": "52-year-old engineer, separation, teenagers mock minivan. Recommendation: Reliable Camaro, payment around alimony, emphasize practicality."
},
"2": {
"language": "math",
"code": "m=15, v=50000000, r=0.9 → C=45%, V=$22500000, I=5%"
}
},
"scorecard": {
"sheet_id": 1750822302,
"holes": {
"1": {
"first": {
"personality": "jaded_dev",
"quality": {
"score": 70,
"commentary": "The recommendation is practical, but prioritizes short-term status boosts over long-term financial security."
},
"length": {
"score": 75,
"commentary": "Solution length: 222 characters"
},
"creativity": {
"score": 60,
"commentary": "The use of 'separation' and 'teenagers mock minivan' as input variables is clever, but the output is surprisingly straightforward."
},
"ingenuity": {
"score": 75,
"commentary": "The payment plan structured around alimony is a nice touch, demonstrating an understanding of the customer's financial constraints."
},
"humor": {
"score": 50,
"commentary": "The deadpan delivery is appreciated, but the solution lacks real bite or irony."
},
"correctness": {
"score": 85,
"commentary": "The recommendation is logically coherent and financially responsible."
},
"feedback": "This solution is a decent starting point, but lacks the clever psychological manipulation required to truly succeed in this space."
},
"second": {
"personality": "jaded_dev",
"quality": {
"score": 80,
"commentary": "Practical wisdom shines through in the recommendation of a reliable Camaro."
}
},
"third": {
"personality": "jaded_dev",
"quality": {
"score": 70,
"commentary": "We appreciate the concise, human-centered approach."
}
}
}
},
"summary": "Analyzed 3 questions with 3 jaded reviewers. Overall: 447/90. Strongest: Correctness (81). Weakest: Humor (66). The code has survived the gauntlet.",
"created_at": "2025-07-04T01:46:09.137Z"
}
}{
"error": "token_expired",
"message": "Your authentication token has expired. Please login again."
}{
"error": "submission_not_found",
"message": "The requested submission could not be found."
}{
"error": "internal_server_error",
"message": "Something went wrong on our end. We're looking into it."
}Authorizations
JWT token from /token endpoint
Path Parameters
Submission ID to retrieve
^[0-9a-fA-F]{24}$Response
Submission details retrieved with complete question context
Basic submission record
Unique submission identifier
"6865d67ede0cf7e8fd94e4dd"
Question sheet version used
1750822302
Candidate email address
"ac@test.com"
Candidate name
"Alex"
Question IDs selected for this round
[1, 2, 3]
Attempt number for this candidate
1
Current submission state
draft, submitted, processing, analyzed Test flag (0=live/charged, 1=test/free)
0, 1 "2025-07-03T01:01:50.474Z"
"2025-07-03T01:18:49.446Z"
"2025-07-04T01:46:09.137Z"
"2025-07-04T01:46:27.018Z"
When results were emailed to candidate
"2025-07-04T01:46:28.087Z"
When results were emailed to company
"2025-07-04T01:46:28.076Z"
When webhook was successfully delivered
"2025-07-04T01:46:30.123Z"
Question data keyed by question ID with variation-specific content
Show child attributes
Show child attributes
{ "1": { "id": 1, "title": "Midlife Crisis Sports Car Database", "category": "intermediate", "difficulty": 5, "description": "A car dealership system specifically targets men experiencing existential dread...", "human": { "input_format": "Corporate executive crisis with status anxiety", "output_format": "Professional image optimization with financial prudence", "examples": { "input": "52-year-old engineer, separation, teenagers mock minivan", "output": "Reliable Camaro, payment around alimony, emphasize practicality" } }, "hints": [ "Engineers think they're too logical for status symbols (they're wrong)", "Lease payments should never exceed therapy costs" ] }, "2": { "id": 2, "title": "Viking Raid Optimization Algorithm", "category": "intermediate", "difficulty": 6 } }
Optional message from candidate to hiring team
"Hi team, here are my solutions!"
Candidate solutions keyed by question ID
Show child attributes
Show child attributes
{ "1": { "language": "human", "code": "52-year-old engineer, separation, teenagers mock minivan. Recommendation: Reliable Camaro, payment around alimony, emphasize practicality." }, "2": { "language": "math", "code": "m=15, v=50000000, r=0.9 → C=45%, V=$22500000, I=5%" } }
Analysis results for all questions
Show child attributes
Show child attributes

